| | | | | | |

Core i7-9700K vs i7-10870H


Description
The i7-9700K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700K gets a score of 494.4 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 1 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
a0652
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/8
8/16
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2018
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.96k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
494.38k points
487.05k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9700K
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.97k
4.77k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
17.98k
19.81k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.89k
6.29k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.49k
14.03k (x0.97)
TOTAL
43.32k
44.9k (x1.04)

Multithread

i7-9700K

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
37.81k
31.21k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
138.05k
151.01k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.78k
50.13k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.13k
8.37k (x1.17)
TOTAL
224.77k
240.71k (x1.07)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9700K
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.94k
17.17k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
25.66k
25.26k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.46k
6.7k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.52k
13.81k (x0.95)
TOTAL
64.58k
62.95k (x0.97)

Multithread

i7-9700K

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
136.23k
116.68k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
191.58k
187.28k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.51k
51.52k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.25k
8.39k (x1.16)
TOTAL
379.56k
363.87k (x0.96)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-9700K
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.43k
16.14k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
26.9k
24.74k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.24k
5.98k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.12k
12.7k (x0.9)
TOTAL
64.69k
59.55k (x0.92)

Multithread

i7-9700K

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
134.6k
117.03k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
191.15k
199.88k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.84k
50.64k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.25k
8.23k (x1.14)
TOTAL
375.84k
375.77k (x1)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9700K
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
32.45k
30.38k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
28.3k
27.95k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.27k
6.51k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.93k
14.37k (x0.96)
TOTAL
81.96k
79.2k (x0.97)

Multithread

i7-9700K

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
244.31k
216.18k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
199.72k
210.82k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.15k
51.57k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.2k
8.47k (x1.18)
TOTAL
494.38k
487.05k (x0.99)

Performance/W
i7-9700K
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
2572 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2102 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
454 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
5204 points/W
10823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9700K
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
6623 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5776 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1281 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3047 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
16726 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4