| | | | | | |

Core i7-9700K vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i7-9700K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700K gets a score of 494.4 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 3.5 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
706e5
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2018
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
81.96k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
494.38k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9700K
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.97k
4.05k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
17.98k
15.29k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.89k
9.04k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.49k
10.54k (x0.73)
TOTAL
43.32k
38.92k (x0.9)

Multithread

i7-9700K

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
37.81k
9.05k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
138.05k
33.88k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.78k
15.34k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.13k
6.74k (x0.94)
TOTAL
224.77k
65.01k (x0.29)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9700K
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
17.94k
7.07k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
25.66k
10.55k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.46k
5.27k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.52k
5.66k (x0.39)
TOTAL
64.58k
28.56k (x0.44)

Multithread

i7-9700K

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
136.23k
25.28k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
191.58k
37.48k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.51k
17.77k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.25k
6.92k (x0.95)
TOTAL
379.56k
87.45k (x0.23)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-9700K
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
17.43k
13.9k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
26.9k
20.13k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.24k
9.41k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.12k
10.59k (x0.75)
TOTAL
64.69k
54.03k (x0.84)

Multithread

i7-9700K

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
134.6k
55.4k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
191.15k
59.01k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.84k
22.83k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.25k
6.7k (x0.92)
TOTAL
375.84k
143.94k (x0.38)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9700K
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
32.45k
25.53k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
28.3k
19.99k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.27k
9.31k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.93k
10.81k (x0.72)
TOTAL
81.96k
65.64k (x0.8)

Multithread

i7-9700K

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
244.31k
58.46k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
199.72k
57.31k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.15k
20.1k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.2k
6.81k (x0.95)
TOTAL
494.38k
142.69k (x0.29)

Performance/W
i7-9700K
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2572 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2102 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
454 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
5204 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-9700K
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6623 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5776 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1281 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3047 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
16726 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4