Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i7-9700K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700K gets a score of 494.4 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 2.9 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700K gets a score of 494.4 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 2.9 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
810f81
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2018
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
81.96k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
494.38k points
168.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-9700K
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.97k
3.89k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
17.98k
17.94k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.89k
5.34k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.49k
6.62k (x0.46)
TOTAL
43.32k
33.79k (x0.78)
Multithread
i7-9700K
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
37.81k
15.07k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
138.05k
66.84k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
41.78k
19.56k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.13k
6.54k (x0.92)
TOTAL
224.77k
108.01k (x0.48)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-9700K
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
17.94k
14.3k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
25.66k
21.69k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.46k
5.42k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.52k
6.6k (x0.45)
TOTAL
64.58k
48k (x0.74)
Multithread
i7-9700K
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
136.23k
55.45k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
191.58k
83.13k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
44.51k
20.76k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.25k
6.58k (x0.91)
TOTAL
379.56k
165.91k (x0.44)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-9700K
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
17.43k
13.05k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
26.9k
22.88k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.24k
5.39k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.12k
7.31k (x0.52)
TOTAL
64.69k
48.63k (x0.75)
Multithread
i7-9700K
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
134.6k
51.73k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
191.15k
87.74k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.84k
20.74k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.25k
6.57k (x0.91)
TOTAL
375.84k
166.79k (x0.44)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9700K
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
32.45k
14.48k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
28.3k
23.84k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.27k
5.43k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.93k
5.46k (x0.37)
TOTAL
81.96k
49.21k (x0.6)
Multithread
i7-9700K
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
244.31k
54.39k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
199.72k
88.77k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.15k
20.04k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.2k
5.48k (x0.76)
TOTAL
494.38k
168.69k (x0.34)
Performance/W
i7-9700K
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
2572 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2102 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
454 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
5204 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9700K
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6623 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5776 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1281 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3047 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
16726 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4