Core i7-9700K vs i5-11400
Description
The i7-9700K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-11400 is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700K gets a score of 494.4 k points while the i5-11400 gets 489.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 1 times faster than the i5-11400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-9700K gets a score of 494.4 k points while the i5-11400 gets 489.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 1 times faster than the i5-11400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
a0671
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/8
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2018
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
81.96k points
86.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
494.38k points
489.31k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-9700K
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
32.45k
31.23k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
28.3k
25.88k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.27k
10.83k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.93k
18.17k (x1.22)
TOTAL
81.96k
86.11k (x1.05)
Multithread
i7-9700K
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
244.31k
213.85k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
199.72k
195.51k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
43.15k
72.06k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.2k
7.89k (x1.1)
TOTAL
494.38k
489.31k (x0.99)
Performance/W
i7-9700K
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
2572 points/W
3290 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2102 points/W
3008 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
454 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
5204 points/W
7528 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-9700K
i5-11400
Test#1 (Integers)
6623 points/GHz
7098 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5776 points/GHz
5881 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1281 points/GHz
2461 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3047 points/GHz
4130 points/GHz
TOTAL
16726 points/GHz
19570 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4