| | | | | | |

Core i7-7500U vs i5-10210Y


Description
The i7-7500U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10210Y is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7500U gets a score of 86.9 k points while the i5-10210Y gets 81.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7500U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
806ec
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Comet Lake-Y
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1377
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
7 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2016
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
48.67k points
44.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
86.94k points
81.79k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7500U
i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
20.74k
17.9k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
18.41k
15.89k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
3.58k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
6.78k (x1.22)
TOTAL
48.67k
44.15k (x0.91)

Multithread

i7-7500U

i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
37.34k
33.78k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
35.79k
34.63k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.34k
8.09k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
5.29k (x0.97)
TOTAL
86.94k
81.79k (x0.94)

Performance/W
i7-7500U
i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
2489 points/W
4826 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2386 points/W
4947 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
556 points/W
1155 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
365 points/W
756 points/W
TOTAL
5796 points/W
11684 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7500U
i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
5926 points/GHz
4476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5260 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1137 points/GHz
895 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1584 points/GHz
1694 points/GHz
TOTAL
13907 points/GHz
11037 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4