Core i7-7500U vs Ryzen 3 3350U
Description
The i7-7500U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7500U gets a score of 86.9 k points while the 3350U gets 123.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 1.4 times faster than the i7-7500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7500U gets a score of 86.9 k points while the 3350U gets 123.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 1.4 times faster than the i7-7500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2016
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
48.67k points
36.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
86.94k points
123.3k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7500U
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.74k
11.2k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
18.41k
18.26k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
3.99k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
3.03k (x0.55)
TOTAL
48.67k
36.47k (x0.75)
Multithread
i7-7500U
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
37.34k
39.7k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
35.79k
66.52k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.34k
14.48k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
2.6k (x0.47)
TOTAL
86.94k
123.3k (x1.42)
Performance/W
i7-7500U
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
2489 points/W
2646 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2386 points/W
4435 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
556 points/W
966 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
365 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
5796 points/W
8220 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7500U
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
5926 points/GHz
3200 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5260 points/GHz
5217 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1137 points/GHz
1139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1584 points/GHz
865 points/GHz
TOTAL
13907 points/GHz
10421 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4