Core i7-6820HQ vs Ryzen 7 3700U
Description
The i7-6820HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the 3700U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 205.9 k points while the 3700U gets 157.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6820HQ is 1.3 times faster than the 3700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 205.9 k points while the 3700U gets 157.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6820HQ is 1.3 times faster than the 3700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
810f81
Core
Skylake-H
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2015
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
50.1k points
38.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.89k points
157.2k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
3700U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
11.37k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
18.63k
19.79k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
4.28k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.15k
3.3k (x0.54)
TOTAL
50.1k
38.75k (x0.77)
Multithread
i7-6820HQ
3700U
Test#1 (Integers)
91.8k
46.27k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
87.24k
85.35k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
21.83k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.3k
3.75k (x0.6)
TOTAL
205.89k
157.2k (x0.76)
Performance/W
i7-6820HQ
3700U
Test#1 (Integers)
2040 points/W
3085 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1939 points/W
5690 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
457 points/W
1455 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
140 points/W
250 points/W
TOTAL
4575 points/W
10480 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6820HQ
3700U
Test#1 (Integers)
5831 points/GHz
2842 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5174 points/GHz
4949 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
1070 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1708 points/GHz
826 points/GHz
TOTAL
13917 points/GHz
9687 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4