| | | | | | |

Core i7-6820HQ vs Ryzen 5 7530U


Description
The i7-6820HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the 7530U is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 205.9 k points while the 7530U gets 171.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6820HQ is 1.2 times faster than the 7530U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
a50f00
Core
Skylake-H
Barcelo-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
October 2015
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
50.1k points
31.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.89k points
171.39k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
8.81k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
18.63k
10.18k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
4.31k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.15k
8.66k (x1.41)
TOTAL
50.1k
31.96k (x0.64)

Multithread

i7-6820HQ

7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
91.8k
55.98k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
87.24k
76k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
34.38k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.3k
5.04k (x0.8)
TOTAL
205.89k
171.39k (x0.83)

Performance/W
i7-6820HQ
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
2040 points/W
3732 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1939 points/W
5066 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
457 points/W
2292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
140 points/W
336 points/W
TOTAL
4575 points/W
11426 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6820HQ
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
5831 points/GHz
1957 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5174 points/GHz
2262 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1708 points/GHz
1925 points/GHz
TOTAL
13917 points/GHz
7103 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4