Core i7-4790K vs i5-10210Y
Description
The i7-4790K is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10210Y is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4790K gets a score of 212.5 k points while the i5-10210Y gets 81.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4790K is 2.6 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4790K gets a score of 212.5 k points while the i5-10210Y gets 81.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4790K is 2.6 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
806ec
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-Y
Base frecuency
4 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1377
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
88 W
7 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2014
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.6k points
44.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
212.53k points
81.79k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4790K
i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
26.22k
17.9k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
14.81k
15.89k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
3.58k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
6.78k (x1.21)
TOTAL
52.6k
44.15k (x0.84)
Multithread
i7-4790K
i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
106.98k
33.78k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
68.77k
34.63k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.19k
8.09k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.59k
5.29k (x0.55)
TOTAL
212.53k
81.79k (x0.38)
Performance/W
i7-4790K
i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
4826 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
781 points/W
4947 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
309 points/W
1155 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
756 points/W
TOTAL
2415 points/W
11684 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4790K
i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
5960 points/GHz
4476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3366 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1359 points/GHz
895 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1270 points/GHz
1694 points/GHz
TOTAL
11954 points/GHz
11037 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4