Core i7-4790K vs Ryzen 3 3350U
Description
The i7-4790K is based on Haswell architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4790K gets a score of 212.5 k points while the 3350U gets 123.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4790K is 1.7 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4790K gets a score of 212.5 k points while the 3350U gets 123.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4790K is 1.7 times faster than the 3350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
88 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2014
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.6k points
36.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
212.53k points
123.3k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4790K
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
26.22k
11.2k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
14.81k
18.26k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
3.99k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
3.03k (x0.54)
TOTAL
52.6k
36.47k (x0.69)
Multithread
i7-4790K
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
106.98k
39.7k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
68.77k
66.52k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.19k
14.48k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.59k
2.6k (x0.27)
TOTAL
212.53k
123.3k (x0.58)
Performance/W
i7-4790K
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
2646 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
781 points/W
4435 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
309 points/W
966 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
2415 points/W
8220 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4790K
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
5960 points/GHz
3200 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3366 points/GHz
5217 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1359 points/GHz
1139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1270 points/GHz
865 points/GHz
TOTAL
11954 points/GHz
10421 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4