Core i7-4790K vs i3-1125G4
Description
The i7-4790K is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-1125G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4790K gets a score of 212.5 k points while the i3-1125G4 gets 241 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1125G4 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-4790K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-4790K gets a score of 212.5 k points while the i3-1125G4 gets 241 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1125G4 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-4790K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
806c1
Core
Haswell
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
88 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2014
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
52.6k points
56.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
212.53k points
241.03k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-4790K
i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)
26.22k
22.63k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
14.81k
17.36k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
8.89k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
7.37k (x1.32)
TOTAL
52.6k
56.25k (x1.07)
Multithread
i7-4790K
i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)
106.98k
103.42k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
68.77k
102.39k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.19k
32.17k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.59k
3.05k (x0.32)
TOTAL
212.53k
241.03k (x1.13)
Performance/W
i7-4790K
i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
3694 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
781 points/W
3657 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
309 points/W
1149 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
2415 points/W
8608 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-4790K
i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)
5960 points/GHz
6116 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3366 points/GHz
4691 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1359 points/GHz
2403 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1270 points/GHz
1992 points/GHz
TOTAL
11954 points/GHz
15203 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4