Core i7-3687U vs i3-10110U
Description
The i7-3687U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3687U gets a score of 51 k points while the i3-10110U gets 84.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.7 times faster than the i7-3687U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3687U gets a score of 51 k points while the i3-10110U gets 84.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.7 times faster than the i7-3687U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
806ec
Core
Ivy Bridge
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2 /4
2/4
TDP
17 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2013
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
28.55k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
50.95k points
106.58k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3687U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.17k
14.25k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
10.16k
21.55k (x2.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
5.16k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.36k
4.26k (x0.98)
TOTAL
28.55k
45.22k (x1.58)
Multithread
i7-3687U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.48k
26.15k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
21.1k
44.03k (x2.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.81k
10.71k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.57k
3.28k (x0.72)
TOTAL
50.95k
84.17k (x1.65)
Performance/W
i7-3687U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
1028 points/W
1743 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1241 points/W
2935 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
460 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
269 points/W
218 points/W
TOTAL
2997 points/W
5611 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-3687U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3082 points/GHz
3476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3078 points/GHz
5256 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1170 points/GHz
1258 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1320 points/GHz
1039 points/GHz
TOTAL
8650 points/GHz
11029 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4