| | | | | | |

Core i7-3687U vs i3-1005G1


Description
The i7-3687U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3687U gets a score of 51 k points while the i3-1005G1 gets 98.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1005G1 is 1.9 times faster than the i7-3687U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
706e5
Core
Ivy Bridge
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
2 /4
2/4
TDP
17 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2013
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
28.55k points
50.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
50.95k points
116.63k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3687U
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
10.17k
11.93k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
10.16k
16.99k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
6.43k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.36k
4.59k (x1.05)
TOTAL
28.55k
39.93k (x1.4)

Multithread

i7-3687U

i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
17.48k
29.07k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
21.1k
46.14k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.81k
19.47k (x2.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.57k
4.18k (x0.92)
TOTAL
50.95k
98.86k (x1.94)

Performance/W
i7-3687U
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
1028 points/W
1938 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1241 points/W
3076 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
460 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
269 points/W
279 points/W
TOTAL
2997 points/W
6591 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-3687U
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3082 points/GHz
3510 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3078 points/GHz
4996 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1170 points/GHz
1890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1320 points/GHz
1349 points/GHz
TOTAL
8650 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4