Core i7-3687U vs M-5Y10c
Description
The i7-3687U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3687U gets a score of 51 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.
Summarizing, the M-5Y10c is 1 times faster than the i7-3687U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3687U gets a score of 51 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.
Summarizing, the M-5Y10c is 1 times faster than the i7-3687U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
306d4
Core
Ivy Bridge
Broadwell-Y
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2 /4
2/4
TDP
17 W
5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2013
October 2014
Mean monothread perf.
28.55k points
22.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
50.95k points
51k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3687U
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
10.17k
7.22k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
10.16k
9.98k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
2.75k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.36k
2.98k (x0.68)
TOTAL
28.55k
22.93k (x0.8)
Multithread
i7-3687U
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
17.48k
15.07k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
21.1k
24.8k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.81k
6.68k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.57k
4.46k (x0.98)
TOTAL
50.95k
51k (x1)
Performance/W
i7-3687U
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
1028 points/W
3014 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1241 points/W
4960 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
460 points/W
1335 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
269 points/W
891 points/W
TOTAL
2997 points/W
10200 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-3687U
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
3082 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3078 points/GHz
4990 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1170 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1320 points/GHz
1492 points/GHz
TOTAL
8650 points/GHz
11467 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4