Core i7-3687U vs Athlon X4 760K
Description
The i7-3687U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 760K is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3687U gets a score of 51 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-3687U is 1 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3687U gets a score of 51 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-3687U is 1 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
610f31
Core
Ivy Bridge
Richland
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
Socket FM2
Cores/Threads
2 /4
4/4
TDP
17 W
100 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x16+2x64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
kB
Date
January 2013
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
28.55k points
24.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
50.95k points
49.8k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3687U
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
10.17k
9.53k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
10.16k
8.14k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.86k
3.45k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.36k
3.48k (x0.8)
TOTAL
28.55k
24.6k (x0.86)
Multithread
i7-3687U
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
17.48k
18.2k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
21.1k
19.33k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.81k
8.42k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.57k
3.86k (x0.84)
TOTAL
50.95k
49.8k (x0.98)
Performance/W
i7-3687U
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
1028 points/W
182 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1241 points/W
193 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
460 points/W
84 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
269 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
2997 points/W
498 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-3687U
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
3082 points/GHz
2324 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3078 points/GHz
1986 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1170 points/GHz
842 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1320 points/GHz
849 points/GHz
TOTAL
8650 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4