Core i7-3630QM vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The i7-3630QM is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3630QM gets a score of 93 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 338.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 3.6 times faster than the i7-3630QM . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3630QM gets a score of 93 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 338.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 3.6 times faster than the i7-3630QM . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
306f2
Core
Ivy Bridge
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4 /8
12/24
TDP
45 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2012
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
25.93k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.03k points
452.9k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3630QM
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
9.89k
11.18k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
9.8k
10.06k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.56k
3.21k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
3.12k (x1.16)
TOTAL
25.93k
27.57k (x1.06)
Multithread
i7-3630QM
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
34.03k
140.98k (x4.14)
Test#2 (FP)
40.34k
145.37k (x3.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.47k
45.62k (x3.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
6.75k (x1.3)
TOTAL
93.03k
338.73k (x3.64)
Performance/W
i7-3630QM
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
756 points/W
1175 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
896 points/W
1211 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
380 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
115 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
2067 points/W
2823 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-3630QM
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2908 points/GHz
3607 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2882 points/GHz
3245 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
789 points/GHz
1007 points/GHz
TOTAL
7626 points/GHz
8894 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4