| | | | | | |

Core i7-3630QM vs i7-8750H


Description
The i7-3630QM is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-8750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3630QM gets a score of 93 k points while the i7-8750H gets 231.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-8750H is 2.5 times faster than the i7-3630QM . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
906ea
Core
Ivy Bridge
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4 /8
6/12
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
9216 kB
Date
September 2012
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
25.93k points
53.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.03k points
231.9k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3630QM
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
9.89k
15.14k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
9.8k
22.8k (x2.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.56k
5.5k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
10.97k (x4.09)
TOTAL
25.93k
54.41k (x2.1)

Multithread

i7-3630QM

i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
34.03k
82.81k (x2.43)
Test#2 (FP)
40.34k
118.58k (x2.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.47k
25.08k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
4.86k (x0.94)
TOTAL
93.03k
231.34k (x2.49)

Performance/W
i7-3630QM
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
756 points/W
1840 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
896 points/W
2635 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
557 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
115 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
2067 points/W
5141 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-3630QM
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2908 points/GHz
3692 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2882 points/GHz
5562 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
1342 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
789 points/GHz
2674 points/GHz
TOTAL
7626 points/GHz
13270 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4