Core i7-3630QM vs i7-10750H
Description
The i7-3630QM is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3630QM gets a score of 93 k points while the i7-10750H gets 212.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 2.3 times faster than the i7-3630QM . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3630QM gets a score of 93 k points while the i7-10750H gets 212.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 2.3 times faster than the i7-3630QM . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
a0652
Core
Ivy Bridge
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4 /8
6/12
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2012
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
25.93k points
74.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.03k points
345.73k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3630QM
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
9.89k
16.71k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
9.8k
25.45k (x2.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.56k
6.06k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
13.2k (x4.92)
TOTAL
25.93k
61.43k (x2.37)
Multithread
i7-3630QM
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
34.03k
67.59k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
40.34k
111.94k (x2.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.47k
27.7k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
5.3k (x1.02)
TOTAL
93.03k
212.53k (x2.28)
Performance/W
i7-3630QM
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
756 points/W
1502 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
896 points/W
2487 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
615 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
115 points/W
118 points/W
TOTAL
2067 points/W
4723 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-3630QM
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2908 points/GHz
3342 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2882 points/GHz
5091 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
1213 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
789 points/GHz
2639 points/GHz
TOTAL
7626 points/GHz
12285 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4