Core i7-3630QM vs i5-5200U
Description
The i7-3630QM is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3630QM gets a score of 93 k points while the i5-5200U gets 50.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-3630QM is 1.8 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3630QM gets a score of 93 k points while the i5-5200U gets 50.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-3630QM is 1.8 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
306d4
Core
Ivy Bridge
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
4 /8
2 /4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2012
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
25.93k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.03k points
68.69k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3630QM
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.89k
8.48k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
9.8k
12.03k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.56k
3.32k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
2.79k (x1.04)
TOTAL
25.93k
26.62k (x1.03)
Multithread
i7-3630QM
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
34.03k
15.19k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
40.34k
25.99k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.47k
6.71k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
2.96k (x0.57)
TOTAL
93.03k
50.85k (x0.55)
Performance/W
i7-3630QM
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
756 points/W
1013 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
896 points/W
1733 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
447 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
115 points/W
197 points/W
TOTAL
2067 points/W
3390 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-3630QM
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2908 points/GHz
3140 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2882 points/GHz
4455 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
1231 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
789 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
TOTAL
7626 points/GHz
9860 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4