Core i7-3630QM vs i3-6100
Description
The i7-3630QM is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3630QM gets a score of 93 k points while the i3-6100 gets 94.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100 is 1 times faster than the i7-3630QM . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3630QM gets a score of 93 k points while the i3-6100 gets 94.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100 is 1 times faster than the i7-3630QM . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
506e3
Core
Ivy Bridge
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4 /8
2/2
TDP
45 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2012
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
25.93k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.03k points
112.28k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3630QM
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
9.89k
13.78k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
9.8k
21.21k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.56k
5.2k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
3.73k (x1.39)
TOTAL
25.93k
43.92k (x1.69)
Multithread
i7-3630QM
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
34.03k
29.02k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
40.34k
49.55k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.47k
12.3k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
3.28k (x0.63)
TOTAL
93.03k
94.15k (x1.01)
Performance/W
i7-3630QM
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
756 points/W
569 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
896 points/W
972 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
241 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
115 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
2067 points/W
1846 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-3630QM
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
2908 points/GHz
3723 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2882 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
1406 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
789 points/GHz
1009 points/GHz
TOTAL
7626 points/GHz
11871 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4