| | | | | | |

Core i7-3630QM vs A6 7400K


Description
The i7-3630QM is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 7400K is based on Steamroller.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3630QM gets a score of 93 k points while the 7400K gets 34.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-3630QM is 2.7 times faster than the 7400K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
630f01
Core
Ivy Bridge
Kaveri
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
Socket FM2+
Cores/Threads
4 /8
2/2
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x16+64 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2012
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
25.93k points
24.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.03k points
34.28k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3630QM
7400K
Test#1 (Integers)
9.89k
8.78k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
9.8k
9.45k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.56k
3.39k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
2.39k (x0.89)
TOTAL
25.93k
24.01k (x0.93)

Multithread

i7-3630QM

7400K
Test#1 (Integers)
34.03k
13.5k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
40.34k
12.17k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.47k
5.96k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
2.65k (x0.51)
TOTAL
93.03k
34.28k (x0.37)

Performance/W
i7-3630QM
7400K
Test#1 (Integers)
756 points/W
208 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
896 points/W
187 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
92 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
115 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
2067 points/W
527 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-3630QM
7400K
Test#1 (Integers)
2908 points/GHz
2252 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2882 points/GHz
2423 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
869 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
789 points/GHz
612 points/GHz
TOTAL
7626 points/GHz
6156 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4