Core i7-3630QM vs i3-1215U
Description
The i7-3630QM is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3630QM gets a score of 93 k points while the i3-1215U gets 129.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1.4 times faster than the i7-3630QM . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3630QM gets a score of 93 k points while the i3-1215U gets 129.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1.4 times faster than the i7-3630QM . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
906a4
Core
Ivy Bridge
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4 /8
6/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
10240 kB
Date
September 2012
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
25.93k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.03k points
185.6k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3630QM
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.89k
15.63k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
9.8k
20.2k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.56k
9.94k (x2.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
8.06k (x3)
TOTAL
25.93k
53.83k (x2.08)
Multithread
i7-3630QM
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
34.03k
35.72k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
40.34k
56.41k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.47k
25k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
12.48k (x2.4)
TOTAL
93.03k
129.6k (x1.39)
Performance/W
i7-3630QM
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
756 points/W
2381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
896 points/W
3761 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
1667 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
115 points/W
832 points/W
TOTAL
2067 points/W
8640 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-3630QM
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
2908 points/GHz
3553 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2882 points/GHz
4591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
2260 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
789 points/GHz
1832 points/GHz
TOTAL
7626 points/GHz
12234 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4