Core i7-3630QM vs i3-1115G4
Description
The i7-3630QM is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3630QM gets a score of 93 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 100.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-3630QM . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-3630QM gets a score of 93 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 100.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-3630QM . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
806c1
Core
Ivy Bridge
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4 /8
2/4
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2012
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
25.93k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.03k points
137.96k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-3630QM
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
9.89k
14.65k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
9.8k
21.57k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.56k
9.93k (x2.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
8.02k (x2.99)
TOTAL
25.93k
54.18k (x2.09)
Multithread
i7-3630QM
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
34.03k
32.14k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
40.34k
43.54k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.47k
19.58k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.19k
5.61k (x1.08)
TOTAL
93.03k
100.87k (x1.08)
Performance/W
i7-3630QM
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
756 points/W
1148 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
896 points/W
1555 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
699 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
115 points/W
200 points/W
TOTAL
2067 points/W
3602 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-3630QM
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2908 points/GHz
3573 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2882 points/GHz
5262 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
2423 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
789 points/GHz
1956 points/GHz
TOTAL
7626 points/GHz
13214 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4