| | | | | | |

Core i7-10870H vs i7-13700HX


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-13700HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the i7-13700HX gets 1070.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700HX is 2.2 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
b06f2
Core
Comet Lake-H
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Comet Lake
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
8/16
16/24
TDP
45 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
109.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
1070.39k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
16.14k
27.23k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
27.1k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
15.65k (x2.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.7k
15.52k (x1.22)
TOTAL
59.55k
85.5k (x1.44)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
117.03k
277.49k (x2.37)
Test#2 (FP)
199.88k
360.68k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.64k
173.57k (x3.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.23k
25.19k (x3.06)
TOTAL
375.77k
836.93k (x2.23)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
48.57k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
28.78k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
15.6k (x2.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
16.46k (x1.15)
TOTAL
79.2k
109.41k (x1.38)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
486.01k (x2.25)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
386.1k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
173.21k (x3.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
25.08k (x2.96)
TOTAL
487.05k
1070.39k (x2.2)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
8836 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
7020 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
3149 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
456 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
19462 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
9715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
3120 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
3293 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
21882 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4