| | | | | | |

Core i7-10870H vs i9-12900HK


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i9-12900HK is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the i9-12900HK gets 622.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900HK is 1.3 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
906a3
Core
Comet Lake-H
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
14/20
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
24576 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
68.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
622.83k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i9-12900HK
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
30.51k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
18.67k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
9.69k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
9.55k (x0.66)
TOTAL
79.2k
68.43k (x0.86)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i9-12900HK
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
273.58k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
228.21k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
111.89k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
9.15k (x1.08)
TOTAL
487.05k
622.83k (x1.28)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
i9-12900HK
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
6080 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
5071 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
2486 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
203 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
13841 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
i9-12900HK
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
6103 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
3734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1938 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
1911 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
13686 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4