| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs i9-13900HX


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 345.7 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 877.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 2.5 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
b0671
Core
Comet Lake-H
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Comet Lake
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
6/12
24/32
TDP
45 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
36864 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
74.6k points
104.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
345.73k points
877.5k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
16.63k
28.5k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
24.17k
29.03k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.38k
11.57k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
14.71k (x1.07)
TOTAL
60.87k
83.8k (x1.38)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
67.07k
196.13k (x2.92)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
222.91k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
129.21k (x4.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
24.26k (x4.78)
TOTAL
207.14k
572.52k (x2.76)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
28.66k
49.8k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
26.2k
26.07k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.14k
13.65k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.59k
15.38k (x1.13)
TOTAL
74.6k
104.9k (x1.41)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
152.33k
375.69k (x2.47)
Test#2 (FP)
150.28k
329.21k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.1k
157.71k (x4.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.02k
14.89k (x2.12)
TOTAL
345.73k
877.5k (x2.54)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3385 points/W
6831 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3339 points/W
5986 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
802 points/W
2867 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
156 points/W
271 points/W
TOTAL
7683 points/W
15955 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
5733 points/GHz
9222 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5240 points/GHz
4828 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1228 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2718 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
14919 points/GHz
19427 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4