Core i7-10750H vs i5-11400F
Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 345.7 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.4 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 345.7 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.4 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
a0671
Core
Comet Lake-H
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.6k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
345.73k points
495.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
28.66k
31.66k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
26.2k
26.21k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.14k
11.96k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.59k
18.5k (x1.36)
TOTAL
74.6k
88.34k (x1.18)
Multithread
i7-10750H
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
152.33k
210.36k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
150.28k
203.84k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.1k
72.05k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.02k
9.4k (x1.34)
TOTAL
345.73k
495.65k (x1.43)
Performance/W
i7-10750H
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3385 points/W
3236 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3339 points/W
3136 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
802 points/W
1108 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
156 points/W
145 points/W
TOTAL
7683 points/W
7625 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5733 points/GHz
7196 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5240 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1228 points/GHz
2718 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2718 points/GHz
4205 points/GHz
TOTAL
14919 points/GHz
20076 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4