| | | | | | |

Core i5-8265U vs Ryzen 5 7530U


Description
The i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 7530U is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 149.5 k points while the 7530U gets 171.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 7530U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806eb
a50f00
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Barcelo-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
August 2018
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
57.57k points
31.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
149.48k points
171.39k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8265U
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.32k
8.81k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
20.35k
10.18k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
4.31k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
8.66k (x1.02)
TOTAL
57.57k
31.96k (x0.56)

Multithread

i5-8265U

7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
65.17k
55.98k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
63.6k
76k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.4k
34.38k (x2.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
5.04k (x0.8)
TOTAL
149.48k
171.39k (x1.15)

Performance/W
i5-8265U
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
4345 points/W
3732 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4240 points/W
5066 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
960 points/W
2292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
336 points/W
TOTAL
9965 points/W
11426 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8265U
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
6235 points/GHz
1957 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5219 points/GHz
2262 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1124 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2183 points/GHz
1925 points/GHz
TOTAL
14762 points/GHz
7103 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4