| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300U vs Xeon E5-2698 v3


Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-2698 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 109.1 k points while the E5-2698 v3 gets 1023.7 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2698 v3 is 9.4 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
306f2
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
16/32
TDP
15 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
16x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
40960 kB
Date
January 2017
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
39.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
1023.68k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300U
E5-2698 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
20.18k
20.85k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
18.57k
10.77k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.24k
4.66k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
3.02k (x0.57)
TOTAL
48.25k
39.29k (x0.81)

Multithread

i5-7300U

E5-2698 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
47.75k
533.68k (x11.18)
Test#2 (FP)
44.82k
328.47k (x7.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
137.01k (x12.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.7k
24.52k (x4.3)
TOTAL
109.1k
1023.68k (x9.38)

Performance/W
i5-7300U
E5-2698 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3184 points/W
3953 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2988 points/W
2433 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
1015 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
380 points/W
182 points/W
TOTAL
7273 points/W
7583 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
E5-2698 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5766 points/GHz
5791 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5306 points/GHz
2991 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1213 points/GHz
1294 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1501 points/GHz
838 points/GHz
TOTAL
13785 points/GHz
10914 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4