Core i5-7300U vs FX 8320E
Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 8320E is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 84.8 k points while the 8320E gets 95 k points.
Summarizing, the 8320E is 1.1 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 84.8 k points while the 8320E gets 95 k points.
Summarizing, the 8320E is 1.1 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
600f20
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Vishera
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/8
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+8x16 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8142 kB
Date
January 2017
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
26.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
94.99k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300U
8320E
Test#1 (Integers)
9.85k
9.23k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
17.37k
7.95k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
3.41k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.11k
6k (x1.17)
TOTAL
36.31k
26.58k (x0.73)
Multithread
i5-7300U
8320E
Test#1 (Integers)
25.37k
35.09k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
43.43k
36k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.62k
18.54k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
5.36k (x0.99)
TOTAL
84.82k
94.99k (x1.12)
Performance/W
i5-7300U
8320E
Test#1 (Integers)
1691 points/W
369 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2896 points/W
379 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
708 points/W
195 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
360 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
5655 points/W
1000 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
8320E
Test#1 (Integers)
2816 points/GHz
2306 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4962 points/GHz
1986 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1137 points/GHz
854 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1461 points/GHz
1499 points/GHz
TOTAL
10376 points/GHz
6646 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4