| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300U vs i9-12900HK


Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i9-12900HK is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 109.1 k points while the i9-12900HK gets 622.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900HK is 5.7 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
906a3
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
2/4
14/20
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
68.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
622.83k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i9-12900HK
Test#1 (Integers)
20.18k
30.51k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
18.57k
18.67k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.24k
9.69k (x2.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
9.55k (x1.82)
TOTAL
48.25k
68.43k (x1.42)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i9-12900HK
Test#1 (Integers)
47.75k
273.58k (x5.73)
Test#2 (FP)
44.82k
228.21k (x5.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
111.89k (x10.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.7k
9.15k (x1.61)
TOTAL
109.1k
622.83k (x5.71)

Performance/W
i5-7300U
i9-12900HK
Test#1 (Integers)
3184 points/W
6080 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2988 points/W
5071 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
2486 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
380 points/W
203 points/W
TOTAL
7273 points/W
13841 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
i9-12900HK
Test#1 (Integers)
5766 points/GHz
6103 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5306 points/GHz
3734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1213 points/GHz
1938 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1501 points/GHz
1911 points/GHz
TOTAL
13785 points/GHz
13686 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4