Core i5-4278U vs Ryzen 3 3350U
Description
The i5-4278U is based on Haswell architecture while the 3350U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4278U gets a score of 76.2 k points while the 3350U gets 123.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 1.6 times faster than the i5-4278U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4278U gets a score of 76.2 k points while the 3350U gets 123.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3350U is 1.6 times faster than the i5-4278U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1168
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2014
March 2019
Mean monothread perf.
34.55k points
36.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.18k points
123.3k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4278U
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.58k
11.2k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
9.35k
18.26k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.99k
3.99k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.64k
3.03k (x0.83)
TOTAL
34.55k
36.47k (x1.06)
Multithread
i5-4278U
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
38.45k
39.7k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
23.07k
66.52k (x2.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10k
14.48k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
2.6k (x0.56)
TOTAL
76.18k
123.3k (x1.62)
Performance/W
i5-4278U
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
1373 points/W
2646 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
824 points/W
4435 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
357 points/W
966 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
2721 points/W
8220 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4278U
3350U
Test#1 (Integers)
5670 points/GHz
3200 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3015 points/GHz
5217 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1288 points/GHz
1139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1173 points/GHz
865 points/GHz
TOTAL
11145 points/GHz
10421 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4