Core i5-10500H vs i5-10210Y
Description
Both models i5-10500H and i5-10210Y are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 379 k points while the i5-10210Y gets 81.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 4.6 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 379 k points while the i5-10210Y gets 81.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 4.6 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
806ec
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-Y
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1377
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
7 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
72.1k points
44.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
378.99k points
81.79k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500H
i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
27.93k
17.9k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
25.41k
15.89k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
3.58k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.85k
6.78k (x0.53)
TOTAL
72.1k
44.15k (x0.61)
Multithread
i5-10500H
i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
176.41k
33.78k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
158.8k
34.63k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.53k
8.09k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
5.29k (x1.01)
TOTAL
378.99k
81.79k (x0.22)
Performance/W
i5-10500H
i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
2714 points/W
4826 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2443 points/W
4947 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
1155 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
756 points/W
TOTAL
5831 points/W
11684 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500H
i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
6207 points/GHz
4476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
895 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2856 points/GHz
1694 points/GHz
TOTAL
16023 points/GHz
11037 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4