Core i5-10500H vs FX 8320E
Description
The i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 8320E is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 296 k points while the 8320E gets 95 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 3.1 times faster than the 8320E. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 296 k points while the 8320E gets 95 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 3.1 times faster than the 8320E. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
600f20
Core
Comet Lake-S
Vishera
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM3+
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/8
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+8x16 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8142 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
72.1k points
26.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
378.99k points
94.99k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500H
8320E
Test#1 (Integers)
15.86k
9.23k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
24.07k
7.95k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
3.41k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.82k
6k (x0.51)
TOTAL
57.69k
26.58k (x0.46)
Multithread
i5-10500H
8320E
Test#1 (Integers)
97.37k
35.09k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
154.42k
36k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.76k
18.54k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
5.36k (x0.99)
TOTAL
295.96k
94.99k (x0.32)
Performance/W
i5-10500H
8320E
Test#1 (Integers)
1498 points/W
369 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2376 points/W
379 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
596 points/W
195 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
83 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
4553 points/W
1000 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500H
8320E
Test#1 (Integers)
3524 points/GHz
2306 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5350 points/GHz
1986 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1320 points/GHz
854 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2627 points/GHz
1499 points/GHz
TOTAL
12820 points/GHz
6646 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4