Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 7800X3D is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 390.8 k points while the 7800X3D gets 704.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7800X3D is 1.8 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 390.8 k points while the 7800X3D gets 704.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7800X3D is 1.8 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
a60f12
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raphael
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM5
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
98304 kB
Date
May 2020
April 2023
Mean monothread perf.
72.25k points
104.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
390.78k points
704.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
28.39k
36.77k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
24.89k
23.4k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
14.8k (x2.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.19k
29.28k (x2.22)
TOTAL
72.25k
104.26k (x1.44)
Multithread
i5-10400F
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
180.2k
249.4k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
163.51k
167.65k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.6k
104.85k (x2.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.48k
182.98k (x28.23)
TOTAL
390.78k
704.89k (x1.8)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
2772 points/W
2078 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2515 points/W
1397 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
625 points/W
874 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
1525 points/W
TOTAL
6012 points/W
5874 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
7800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
6603 points/GHz
7354 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5788 points/GHz
4680 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1344 points/GHz
2961 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3067 points/GHz
5857 points/GHz
TOTAL
16803 points/GHz
20852 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4