Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 5500
Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5500 is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 369 k points while the 5500 gets 373 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500 is 1 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 369 k points while the 5500 gets 373 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500 is 1 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a50f00
Core
Comet Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
68.02k points
80.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.01k points
373.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
26.29k
22.09k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
24.59k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
10.94k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.84k
22.89k (x1.78)
TOTAL
68.02k
80.52k (x1.18)
Multithread
i5-10400F
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
163.37k
124.44k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
159.38k
167.06k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.87k
74.34k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.39k
7.2k (x0.97)
TOTAL
369.01k
373.05k (x1.01)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
2513 points/W
1914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2452 points/W
2570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
598 points/W
1144 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
114 points/W
111 points/W
TOTAL
5677 points/W
5739 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
6113 points/GHz
5261 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5437 points/GHz
5855 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
2604 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2987 points/GHz
5451 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
19170 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4