| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs Ryzen 7 3700X


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 3700X is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the 3700X gets 482.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 3700X is 3.4 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
870f10
Core
Ice Lake-U
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
32768 kB
Date
August 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
74.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
482.11k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
4.42k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
19.3k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
8k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
24.54k (x2.33)
TOTAL
38.92k
56.26k (x1.45)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
33.79k (x3.73)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
167.76k (x4.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
89.44k (x5.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
9.55k (x1.42)
TOTAL
65.01k
300.54k (x4.62)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
16.77k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
26.3k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
8.81k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
22.53k (x2.08)
TOTAL
65.64k
74.41k (x1.13)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
165.4k (x2.83)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
208.96k (x3.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
92.87k (x4.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
14.87k (x2.18)
TOTAL
142.69k
482.11k (x3.38)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
2545 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
3215 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
1429 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
229 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
7417 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
3811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5978 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
2002 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
5120 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
16911 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4