Core i5-10210Y vs Xeon E5-2680 v4
Description
The i5-10210Y is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 14.2 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 14.2 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
406f1
Core
Comet Lake-Y
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1377
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
14/28
TDP
7 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
35840 kB
Date
August 2019
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
44.15k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.79k points
1162.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210Y
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
17.9k
17.8k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
15.89k
16.51k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
4.47k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
2.56k (x0.38)
TOTAL
44.15k
41.35k (x0.94)
Multithread
i5-10210Y
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
33.78k
494.82k (x14.65)
Test#2 (FP)
34.63k
514.13k (x14.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
132.87k (x16.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
20.8k (x3.93)
TOTAL
81.79k
1162.63k (x14.22)
Performance/W
i5-10210Y
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
4826 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4947 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1155 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
756 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
11684 points/W
9689 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210Y
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
4476 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
895 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1694 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
11037 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4