Core i5-10210Y vs E5-2620 v3
Description
The i5-10210Y is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 4.4 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 4.4 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
306f2
Core
Comet Lake-Y
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1377
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
7 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
15360 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
44.15k points
35.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.79k points
357.99k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210Y
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
17.9k
18.64k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
15.89k
10.55k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
4.12k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
2.54k (x0.37)
TOTAL
44.15k
35.86k (x0.81)
Multithread
i5-10210Y
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
33.78k
181.66k (x5.38)
Test#2 (FP)
34.63k
122.09k (x3.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
47.02k (x5.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
7.22k (x1.36)
TOTAL
81.79k
357.99k (x4.38)
Performance/W
i5-10210Y
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4826 points/W
2137 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4947 points/W
1436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1155 points/W
553 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
756 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
11684 points/W
4212 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210Y
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4476 points/GHz
5826 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
3297 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
895 points/GHz
1288 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1694 points/GHz
794 points/GHz
TOTAL
11037 points/GHz
11205 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4