Core i5-10210Y vs i7-5500U
Description
The i5-10210Y is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-5500U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the i7-5500U gets 82.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5500U is 1 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the i7-5500U gets 82.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5500U is 1 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
306d4
Core
Comet Lake-Y
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1377
BGA 1168
Cores/Threads
4/8
2 /4
TDP
7 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
44.15k points
40.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.79k points
82.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210Y
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.9k
17.76k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
15.89k
14.9k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
4.17k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
3.58k (x0.53)
TOTAL
44.15k
40.41k (x0.92)
Multithread
i5-10210Y
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
33.78k
34.9k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
34.63k
35.07k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
9.28k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
3.64k (x0.69)
TOTAL
81.79k
82.89k (x1.01)
Performance/W
i5-10210Y
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
4826 points/W
2327 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4947 points/W
2338 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1155 points/W
619 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
756 points/W
243 points/W
TOTAL
11684 points/W
5526 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210Y
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
4476 points/GHz
5920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
4966 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
895 points/GHz
1390 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1694 points/GHz
1193 points/GHz
TOTAL
11037 points/GHz
13469 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4