Core i5-10210Y vs i7-4790K
Description
The i5-10210Y is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-4790K is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the i7-4790K gets 212.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4790K is 2.6 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the i7-4790K gets 212.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4790K is 2.6 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-Y
Haswell
Base frecuency
1 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1377
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
7 W
88 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
44.15k points
52.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.79k points
212.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210Y
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
17.9k
26.22k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
15.89k
14.81k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
5.98k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
5.59k (x0.82)
TOTAL
44.15k
52.6k (x1.19)
Multithread
i5-10210Y
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
33.78k
106.98k (x3.17)
Test#2 (FP)
34.63k
68.77k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
27.19k (x3.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
9.59k (x1.81)
TOTAL
81.79k
212.53k (x2.6)
Performance/W
i5-10210Y
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
4826 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4947 points/W
781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1155 points/W
309 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
756 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
11684 points/W
2415 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210Y
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
4476 points/GHz
5960 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
3366 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
895 points/GHz
1359 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1694 points/GHz
1270 points/GHz
TOTAL
11037 points/GHz
11954 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4