Core i5-10210Y vs i7-4600U
Description
The i5-10210Y is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-4600U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the i7-4600U gets 64.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210Y is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4600U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the i7-4600U gets 64.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210Y is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4600U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
40651
Core
Comet Lake-Y
Haswell
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1377
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
7 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
44.15k points
28.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.79k points
64.55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210Y
i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.9k
14.37k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
15.89k
8.31k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
3.35k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
2.96k (x0.44)
TOTAL
44.15k
28.98k (x0.66)
Multithread
i5-10210Y
i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
33.78k
31.32k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
34.63k
20.17k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
8.02k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
5.03k (x0.95)
TOTAL
81.79k
64.55k (x0.79)
Performance/W
i5-10210Y
i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
4826 points/W
2088 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4947 points/W
1345 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1155 points/W
535 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
756 points/W
336 points/W
TOTAL
11684 points/W
4303 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210Y
i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
4476 points/GHz
4353 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
2517 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
895 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1694 points/GHz
896 points/GHz
TOTAL
11037 points/GHz
8781 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4