Core i5-10210Y vs i5-9500
Description
The i5-10210Y is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the i5-9500 gets 352.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 4.3 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the i5-9500 gets 352.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 4.3 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
906ea
Core
Comet Lake-Y
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1377
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
7 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
9216 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
44.15k points
73.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.79k points
352.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210Y
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
17.9k
29.17k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
15.89k
25.49k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
5.84k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
13.15k (x1.94)
TOTAL
44.15k
73.65k (x1.67)
Multithread
i5-10210Y
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
33.78k
166.66k (x4.93)
Test#2 (FP)
34.63k
146.9k (x4.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
34.04k (x4.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
5.25k (x0.99)
TOTAL
81.79k
352.84k (x4.31)
Performance/W
i5-10210Y
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
4826 points/W
2564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4947 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1155 points/W
524 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
756 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
11684 points/W
5428 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210Y
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
4476 points/GHz
6629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
895 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1694 points/GHz
2990 points/GHz
TOTAL
11037 points/GHz
16739 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4