Core i5-10210Y vs Ryzen 7 4800H
Description
The i5-10210Y is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4800H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 5.3 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 5.3 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
860f01
Core
Comet Lake-Y
Renoir
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1377
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
7 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
44.15k points
57.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.79k points
436.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210Y
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.9k
16.59k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
15.89k
23.51k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
9.38k (x2.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
7.98k (x1.18)
TOTAL
44.15k
57.47k (x1.3)
Multithread
i5-10210Y
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
33.78k
152.43k (x4.51)
Test#2 (FP)
34.63k
195.79k (x5.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
83.2k (x10.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
5.38k (x1.02)
TOTAL
81.79k
436.8k (x5.34)
Performance/W
i5-10210Y
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4826 points/W
3387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4947 points/W
4351 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1155 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
756 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
11684 points/W
9707 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210Y
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4476 points/GHz
3950 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
5599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
895 points/GHz
2234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1694 points/GHz
1899 points/GHz
TOTAL
11037 points/GHz
13683 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4