Core i5-10210Y vs Ryzen 5 5625U
Description
The i5-10210Y is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5625U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5625U is 3.4 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5625U is 3.4 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
a50f00
Core
Comet Lake-Y
Barcelo
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1377
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
7 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
44.15k points
70.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.79k points
281.26k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210Y
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.9k
18.57k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
15.89k
22.03k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
9.55k (x2.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
20.5k (x3.03)
TOTAL
44.15k
70.65k (x1.6)
Multithread
i5-10210Y
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
33.78k
92.92k (x2.75)
Test#2 (FP)
34.63k
128.4k (x3.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
54.82k (x6.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
5.13k (x0.97)
TOTAL
81.79k
281.26k (x3.44)
Performance/W
i5-10210Y
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
4826 points/W
6194 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4947 points/W
8560 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1155 points/W
3654 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
756 points/W
342 points/W
TOTAL
11684 points/W
18750 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210Y
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
4476 points/GHz
4318 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
895 points/GHz
2221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1694 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
TOTAL
11037 points/GHz
16431 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4