Core i5-10210Y vs Ryzen 5 5500U
Description
The i5-10210Y is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5500U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the 5500U gets 257.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500U is 3.1 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the 5500U gets 257.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500U is 3.1 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
860f81
Core
Comet Lake-Y
Lucienne
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1377
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
7 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
August 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
44.15k points
52.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.79k points
257.24k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210Y
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.9k
14.87k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
15.89k
22.53k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
8.37k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
6.46k (x0.95)
TOTAL
44.15k
52.23k (x1.18)
Multithread
i5-10210Y
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
33.78k
87.91k (x2.6)
Test#2 (FP)
34.63k
116.93k (x3.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
47.64k (x5.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
4.77k (x0.9)
TOTAL
81.79k
257.24k (x3.15)
Performance/W
i5-10210Y
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
4826 points/W
5861 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4947 points/W
7795 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1155 points/W
3176 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
756 points/W
318 points/W
TOTAL
11684 points/W
17149 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210Y
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
4476 points/GHz
3717 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
5633 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
895 points/GHz
2092 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1694 points/GHz
1615 points/GHz
TOTAL
11037 points/GHz
13057 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4