Core i5-10210Y vs Ryzen 5 4600H
Description
The i5-10210Y is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 4.1 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 4.1 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
860f01
Core
Comet Lake-Y
Renoir
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1377
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
7 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
44.15k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.79k points
334.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210Y
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.9k
15.48k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
15.89k
22.82k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
8.63k (x2.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
7.17k (x1.06)
TOTAL
44.15k
54.11k (x1.23)
Multithread
i5-10210Y
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
33.78k
117.98k (x3.49)
Test#2 (FP)
34.63k
146.43k (x4.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
65.54k (x8.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
4.77k (x0.9)
TOTAL
81.79k
334.72k (x4.09)
Performance/W
i5-10210Y
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
4826 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4947 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1155 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
756 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
11684 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210Y
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
4476 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
895 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1694 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
11037 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4