Core i5-10210Y vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i5-10210Y is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 3.7 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 3.7 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-Y
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1377
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
7 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
44.15k points
58.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.79k points
303.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210Y
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
17.9k
14.08k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
15.89k
22.56k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
5.19k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
16.71k (x2.47)
TOTAL
44.15k
58.53k (x1.33)
Multithread
i5-10210Y
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
33.78k
86.62k (x2.56)
Test#2 (FP)
34.63k
168.1k (x4.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
43.51k (x5.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
5.16k (x0.98)
TOTAL
81.79k
303.4k (x3.71)
Performance/W
i5-10210Y
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
4826 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4947 points/W
2586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1155 points/W
669 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
756 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
11684 points/W
4668 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210Y
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
4476 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
6265 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
895 points/GHz
1440 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1694 points/GHz
4642 points/GHz
TOTAL
11037 points/GHz
16259 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4