Core i5-10210Y vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Description
The i5-10210Y is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210Y is 1.1 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210Y is 1.1 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
810f81
Core
Comet Lake-Y
Dali
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1377
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
7 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
44.15k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.79k points
77.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210Y
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.9k
9.33k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
15.89k
17.1k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
3.57k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
3.26k (x0.48)
TOTAL
44.15k
33.26k (x0.75)
Multithread
i5-10210Y
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
33.78k
22.14k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
34.63k
40.04k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
10.71k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
5k (x0.94)
TOTAL
81.79k
77.88k (x0.95)
Performance/W
i5-10210Y
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
4826 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4947 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1155 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
756 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
11684 points/W
5192 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210Y
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
4476 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
895 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1694 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
11037 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4