Core i5-10210Y vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i5-10210Y is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 2.1 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210Y gets a score of 81.8 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 2.1 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
810f81
Core
Comet Lake-Y
Picasso
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1377
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
7 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
44.15k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
81.79k points
168.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210Y
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
17.9k
14.48k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
15.89k
23.84k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.58k
5.43k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
5.46k (x0.81)
TOTAL
44.15k
49.21k (x1.11)
Multithread
i5-10210Y
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
33.78k
54.39k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
34.63k
88.77k (x2.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
20.04k (x2.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
5.48k (x1.04)
TOTAL
81.79k
168.69k (x2.06)
Performance/W
i5-10210Y
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4826 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4947 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1155 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
756 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
11684 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210Y
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4476 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3972 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
895 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1694 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
11037 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4